A Meta-Analysis and Quality of High Probability Request Sequence Studies for Improving Youth Complianceand Persistence
Abstract
The purpose of this meta-analysis was to conduct a systematic review of the literature on the effectiveness and quality of studies using high probability (high-p) request sequences to improve compliance and persistence in children and adolescents. Included studies had to use high-p request sequences (e.g., ―get a drink of water‖ then ―open your math book to page 34‖) and not high-p task sequences (e.g., easy math problems followed by difficult math problems but with the same direction for both). Three effect sizes standard mean difference (SMD), improvement rate difference (IRD), and Tau-U were computed on the 14 included studies. Study quality was assessed by using the Council for Exceptional Children’s (CEC) 2014 eight quality indicators made up of 22 items. Results indicated high-p and low-p request sequences were moderately to highly effective. Study quality was only in the moderate range. Implications for practice are discussed. Noncompliance and failure to persist completing tasks are problems many children display depending on the context, content, and type of direction (Maag, 2018a). These problems are exacerbated for students with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), intellectual disabilities, and developmental disabilities (e.g., Humm, Blampied, & Liberty, 2005; Kelly & Holloway, 2015; Planer, Defar, Progar Reeve, & Sarokoff, 2018; Sanchez-Fort, Brady, & Davis, 1995; Vostal & Lee, 2011). Common approaches for dealing with behaviors that make up noncompliant response classes are rearranging antecedents, various schedules of differential reinforcement, and punishment techniques (e.g., Hagopian & Thompson, 1999; Kern, Childs, Dunlap, Clarke, & Falk, 1994; Matson, Dixon,& Matson, 2005; Olmi, Sevier, & Nastasi, 1997; Weston, Hodges, & Davis, 2018).
Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.15640/jpbs.v7n1a3
Abstract
The purpose of this meta-analysis was to conduct a systematic review of the literature on the effectiveness and quality of studies using high probability (high-p) request sequences to improve compliance and persistence in children and adolescents. Included studies had to use high-p request sequences (e.g., ―get a drink of water‖ then ―open your math book to page 34‖) and not high-p task sequences (e.g., easy math problems followed by difficult math problems but with the same direction for both). Three effect sizes standard mean difference (SMD), improvement rate difference (IRD), and Tau-U were computed on the 14 included studies. Study quality was assessed by using the Council for Exceptional Children’s (CEC) 2014 eight quality indicators made up of 22 items. Results indicated high-p and low-p request sequences were moderately to highly effective. Study quality was only in the moderate range. Implications for practice are discussed. Noncompliance and failure to persist completing tasks are problems many children display depending on the context, content, and type of direction (Maag, 2018a). These problems are exacerbated for students with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), intellectual disabilities, and developmental disabilities (e.g., Humm, Blampied, & Liberty, 2005; Kelly & Holloway, 2015; Planer, Defar, Progar Reeve, & Sarokoff, 2018; Sanchez-Fort, Brady, & Davis, 1995; Vostal & Lee, 2011). Common approaches for dealing with behaviors that make up noncompliant response classes are rearranging antecedents, various schedules of differential reinforcement, and punishment techniques (e.g., Hagopian & Thompson, 1999; Kern, Childs, Dunlap, Clarke, & Falk, 1994; Matson, Dixon,& Matson, 2005; Olmi, Sevier, & Nastasi, 1997; Weston, Hodges, & Davis, 2018).
Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.15640/jpbs.v7n1a3
Browse Journals
Journal Policies
Information
Useful Links
- Call for Papers
- Submit Your Paper
- Publish in Your Native Language
- Subscribe the Journal
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Contact the Executive Editor
- Recommend this Journal to Librarian
- View the Current Issue
- View the Previous Issues
- Recommend this Journal to Friends
- Recommend a Special Issue
- Comment on the Journal
- Publish the Conference Proceedings
Latest Activities
Resources
Visiting Status
 Today |
40 |
| Yesterday |
106 |
| This Month |
689 |
| Last Month |
7413 |
 All Days |
1376340 |
 Online |
32 |
