The Role of Danger Expectancies and Disgust in Obsessive-Compulsive Washing
Abstract
Cognitive Appraisal Models of OCD washing contend that elevated danger expectancies serve as an important risk factor for the disorder. Evidence also indicates that OCD washers may have heightened disgust experiences in response to certain stimuli. This study examined the contribution of danger expectancies and disgust to OCD washing phenomena in a sample of undergraduate students (n=63). All participants completed a Behavioural Avoidance Test (BAT) consisting of a garbage bin containing a mixture of potting soil, raw meat, animal hair and food scraps. Thirty-three participants were randomly allocated to experience a disgust evoking smell during the BAT (disgust condition) and 30 were randomly allocated to a control condition (no disgust evoking smell). Participants exposed to the smell and those with higher levels of pre-existing trait disgust were more likely to avoid the task. Further, participants who had high danger expectancies for the likelihood and severity of a consequent disease showed increased avoidance behaviour. Finally, danger expectancies mediated the relationship between trait disgust and BAT avoidance and exposure to the disgusting smell increased hand sanitiser use post- BAT. The implications of these findings for future research and clinical practice are discussed.
Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.15640/jpbs.v3n1a14
Abstract
Cognitive Appraisal Models of OCD washing contend that elevated danger expectancies serve as an important risk factor for the disorder. Evidence also indicates that OCD washers may have heightened disgust experiences in response to certain stimuli. This study examined the contribution of danger expectancies and disgust to OCD washing phenomena in a sample of undergraduate students (n=63). All participants completed a Behavioural Avoidance Test (BAT) consisting of a garbage bin containing a mixture of potting soil, raw meat, animal hair and food scraps. Thirty-three participants were randomly allocated to experience a disgust evoking smell during the BAT (disgust condition) and 30 were randomly allocated to a control condition (no disgust evoking smell). Participants exposed to the smell and those with higher levels of pre-existing trait disgust were more likely to avoid the task. Further, participants who had high danger expectancies for the likelihood and severity of a consequent disease showed increased avoidance behaviour. Finally, danger expectancies mediated the relationship between trait disgust and BAT avoidance and exposure to the disgusting smell increased hand sanitiser use post- BAT. The implications of these findings for future research and clinical practice are discussed.
Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.15640/jpbs.v3n1a14
Browse Journals
Journal Policies
Information
Useful Links
- Call for Papers
- Submit Your Paper
- Publish in Your Native Language
- Subscribe the Journal
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Contact the Executive Editor
- Recommend this Journal to Librarian
- View the Current Issue
- View the Previous Issues
- Recommend this Journal to Friends
- Recommend a Special Issue
- Comment on the Journal
- Publish the Conference Proceedings
Latest Activities
Resources
Visiting Status
Today | 61 |
Yesterday | 286 |
This Month | 604 |
Last Month | 7413 |
All Days | 1376255 |
Online | 10 |