The Psychology of Habit Change: A Behavioral Science Perspective on Meditation as a Mechanism of Change
Abstract
This review critically examines how meditation, particularly mindfulness-based practices, contributes to habit change through mechanisms grounded in behavioral science. Drawing on dual-process theories, reinforcement learning, and self-regulation models, the paper explores how meditation enhances meta- awareness, disrupts automatic behavioral loops, and facilitates intentional change. Neuroplasticity and attentional control are discussed as mediating factors, supported by neuroimaging studies. The review synthesizes evidence across domains such as substance use, emotional regulation, digital behavior, and eating patterns, while also addressing methodological weaknesses including self-report bias, limited longitudinal data, and inconsistencies in defining mindfulness. An integrative framework is proposed, bridging cognitive neuroscience, contemplative psychology, and behavior analysis. Future research should focus on controlled trials, mechanistic specificity, and diverse populations. By situating meditation within established behavioral paradigms, this review offers a grounded yet innovative perspective on how contemplative practices can reshape automaticity and support sustained habit transformation.
Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.15640/jpbs.v13p5
Abstract
This review critically examines how meditation, particularly mindfulness-based practices, contributes to habit change through mechanisms grounded in behavioral science. Drawing on dual-process theories, reinforcement learning, and self-regulation models, the paper explores how meditation enhances meta- awareness, disrupts automatic behavioral loops, and facilitates intentional change. Neuroplasticity and attentional control are discussed as mediating factors, supported by neuroimaging studies. The review synthesizes evidence across domains such as substance use, emotional regulation, digital behavior, and eating patterns, while also addressing methodological weaknesses including self-report bias, limited longitudinal data, and inconsistencies in defining mindfulness. An integrative framework is proposed, bridging cognitive neuroscience, contemplative psychology, and behavior analysis. Future research should focus on controlled trials, mechanistic specificity, and diverse populations. By situating meditation within established behavioral paradigms, this review offers a grounded yet innovative perspective on how contemplative practices can reshape automaticity and support sustained habit transformation.
Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.15640/jpbs.v13p5
Browse Journals
Journal Policies
Information
Useful Links
- Call for Papers
- Submit Your Paper
- Publish in Your Native Language
- Subscribe the Journal
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Contact the Executive Editor
- Recommend this Journal to Librarian
- View the Current Issue
- View the Previous Issues
- Recommend this Journal to Friends
- Recommend a Special Issue
- Comment on the Journal
- Publish the Conference Proceedings
Latest Activities
Resources
Visiting Status
![]() |
274 |
![]() |
719 |
![]() |
20730 |
![]() |
15100 |
![]() |
1494452 |
![]() |
96 |