Behavioral Health Risk Screening and Interventions for Farmers: Pilot Study in Vermont
Abstract
The Farm First program enables farmers in Vermont experiencing problems to obtain supportive counseling and resources. This study investigated a pilot project to proactively screen farmers for behavioral health problems (i.e., anxiety, depression and substance use) and provide short-term evidence-based interventions from licensed counselors. A sample of 46 clients (35 farmers, 10 farm workers, 1 family member) reported on multiple outcome measures both at the start of use and at three months after final program use. Interventions included informational resources, referrals to local services and individual counseling (n=16; for 3.8 sessions of counseling over 11 weeks, on average). Positive changes were obtained for mental health risks (PHQ-4; clinical anxiety risk status was reduced from 30% of the sample at Pre to 9% at Post), alcohol misuse and use of some psychosocial coping techniques (all p< .05). A follow-up survey revealed positive user satisfaction and program impact (n=27).
Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.15640/jpbs.v13p2
Abstract
The Farm First program enables farmers in Vermont experiencing problems to obtain supportive counseling and resources. This study investigated a pilot project to proactively screen farmers for behavioral health problems (i.e., anxiety, depression and substance use) and provide short-term evidence-based interventions from licensed counselors. A sample of 46 clients (35 farmers, 10 farm workers, 1 family member) reported on multiple outcome measures both at the start of use and at three months after final program use. Interventions included informational resources, referrals to local services and individual counseling (n=16; for 3.8 sessions of counseling over 11 weeks, on average). Positive changes were obtained for mental health risks (PHQ-4; clinical anxiety risk status was reduced from 30% of the sample at Pre to 9% at Post), alcohol misuse and use of some psychosocial coping techniques (all p< .05). A follow-up survey revealed positive user satisfaction and program impact (n=27).
Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.15640/jpbs.v13p2
Browse Journals
Journal Policies
Information
Useful Links
- Call for Papers
- Submit Your Paper
- Publish in Your Native Language
- Subscribe the Journal
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Contact the Executive Editor
- Recommend this Journal to Librarian
- View the Current Issue
- View the Previous Issues
- Recommend this Journal to Friends
- Recommend a Special Issue
- Comment on the Journal
- Publish the Conference Proceedings
Latest Activities
Resources
Visiting Status
![]() |
272 |
![]() |
277 |
![]() |
272 |
![]() |
17227 |
![]() |
1446810 |
![]() |
10 |